FAQ Valuation Discounts Premiums

Interested in Valuing your Business? Contact a Certified Appraiser in the United States

Contact US

Business Valuation FAQs

Find answers to common questions about company valuations, methodologies, and financial analysis

Search through our valuation knowledge base

Can marketability discounts apply when valuing controlling business interests?

Marketability discounts can apply when valuing controlling business interests in private companies because even controlling shareholders face significant costs and time delays when selling their ownership stakes due to lack of established markets for private company shares. While controlling interests avoid minority discounts because they possess the power to direct business operations and make fundamental decisions, they still suffer from illiquidity that justifies marketability discounts typically ranging from 10 to 25 percent for controlling stakes compared to 25 to 40 percent for minority interests. The marketability discount for controlling interests reflects transaction costs including broker fees, legal expenses, due diligence costs, and the time required to find qualified buyers and complete sales, which can take 6 to 18 months even for attractive businesses. Research studies analyzing restricted stock transactions and pre-IPO sales provide empirical support for marketability discounts on controlling interests. Courts have recognized that controlling interests in private companies deserve marketability discounts, though the magnitude is typically smaller than discounts applied to minority interests because controlling shareholders can force liquidity events through sales or public offerings. The specific discount depends on company size, profitability, industry attractiveness, and market conditions affecting the pool of potential buyers and transaction timelines.

What is the relationship between control premium and minority discount?

The relationship between control premium and minority discount is inverse but not symmetrical; they measure the same value differential from opposite perspectives, with control premium representing how much more a controlling interest is worth compared to minority interests, while minority discount represents how much less a minority interest is worth compared to pro-rata controlling value. The mathematical relationship is that minority discount equals control premium divided by one plus control premium, while control premium equals minority discount divided by one minus minority discount. For example, if minority interests trade at a 25 percent discount from pro-rata value, the implied control premium is 33.3 percent (0.25 divided by (1 minus 0.25) equals 0.333), and conversely, a 25 percent control premium implies a 20 percent minority discount (0.25 divided by 1.25 equals 0.20). This relationship reflects that control premiums measure the additional value buyers pay to acquire control from a minority baseline, while minority discounts measure the reduction from a controlling interest baseline. Both concepts recognize that controlling ownership stakes command premium values due to the power to direct operations, declare dividends, sell the company, and implement strategic changes that minority owners cannot effect. Understanding this mathematical relationship is critical for consistent valuation analysis and avoiding errors when converting between control and minority value levels.

How do you calculate minority interest discounts?

You calculate minority interest discounts by analyzing empirical data from public company trading prices compared to acquisition premiums, restricted stock studies, pre-IPO transactions, and partnership interest sales that demonstrate the value differential between controlling and non-controlling ownership stakes. The most common approach examines control premiums paid in public company acquisitions, where buyers pay premiums averaging 25 to 40 percent above pre-announcement trading prices to acquire control, then converts these control premiums to implied minority discounts using the formula: minority discount equals control premium divided by one plus control premium. For example, a 30 percent average control premium implies a 23 percent minority discount (0.30 divided by 1.30 equals 0.23). Additional factors affecting minority discount magnitude include the specific ownership percentage being valued (10 percent interests warrant larger discounts than 49 percent interests), shareholder agreement provisions protecting or limiting minority rights, company distribution history, state law protections against minority oppression, and whether the minority interest has any swing vote value in closely held situations. Appraisers also consider company-specific factors like whether controlling shareholders have history of oppressive behavior, whether buy-sell agreements provide exit mechanisms, and whether the company pays regular dividends that provide some return despite lack of control. Typical minority discounts range from 15 to 35 percent depending on these factors.

What is the average control premium?

The average control premium paid in public company acquisitions typically ranges from 25 to 40 percent above pre-announcement trading prices, with the specific premium varying by industry, target company size, market conditions, and strategic value to acquirers. Research databases like FactSet Mergerstat and S&P Capital IQ track thousands of acquisition transactions and report median control premiums around 30 to 35 percent, though individual transactions show wide variation from zero to over 100 percent depending on circumstances. Control premiums tend to be higher for smaller companies (35 to 45 percent), companies with unique strategic assets, businesses in consolidating industries, and during periods of abundant acquisition financing and competitive bidding. Lower control premiums occur for larger companies (20 to 30 percent), businesses in mature industries, friendly negotiated transactions, and during economic downturns when buyer competition decreases. The control premium compensates buyers for the value of control rights including ability to redirect strategy, replace management, access cash flows, implement operational improvements, and ultimately sell or merge the company. Strategic buyers often pay higher premiums than financial buyers because they can realize synergies through cost savings, revenue enhancements, and operational improvements. Control premiums are used in valuations to adjust minority interest values upward when valuing controlling stakes, or conversely, to calculate implied minority discounts when valuing non-controlling interests.

When is a discount for lack of marketability applicable?

A discount for lack of marketability is applicable when valuing ownership interests in private companies that cannot be readily sold due to absence of established markets, transfer restrictions in shareholder agreements, securities law limitations, or limited pools of potential buyers willing to purchase illiquid investments. DLOM applies to both controlling and minority interests in private companies, though the magnitude differs, with minority interests typically receiving 25 to 40 percent discounts while controlling interests receive 10 to 25 percent discounts reflecting their greater ability to force liquidity events. The discount is appropriate whenever the ownership interest being valued lacks the immediate liquidity and low transaction costs of publicly traded securities. Specific situations requiring DLOM include estate and gift tax valuations of family business interests, shareholder dispute valuations, ESOP valuations (though subject to specific rules), financial reporting for restricted securities, and divorce valuations of business ownership. The discount reflects economic costs including time required to find buyers (often 6 to 18 months), transaction costs like broker fees and legal expenses, uncertainty about ultimate sale prices, and the opportunity cost of capital tied up during the holding period. DLOM is not applicable when valuing publicly traded securities with active markets or when specific sale agreements exist establishing prices and terms for ownership transfers.

What is a discount for lack of control?

A discount for lack of control, also called a minority interest discount, is a reduction in value applied when valuing non-controlling ownership stakes that lack the power to direct business operations, force distributions, elect directors, or make fundamental decisions about the company, typically ranging from 15 to 35 percent depending on the degree of control minority owners lack. This discount reflects the economic disadvantages of minority ownership including inability to control dividend policy, set management compensation, sell or merge the company, access detailed financial information, or influence strategic direction without cooperation from controlling shareholders. The discount for lack of control is most significant in closely held businesses where controlling shareholders make all major decisions and minority owners have limited statutory or contractual protections. The magnitude depends on the specific ownership percentage (a 5 percent interest warrants a larger discount than a 40 percent interest), rights granted in shareholder agreements, company history of distributions to shareholders, and state law protections against minority oppression. Some minority interests have swing vote value in situations where no single shareholder has majority control, potentially reducing or eliminating the lack of control discount. The discount is derived from empirical studies of control premiums paid in public company acquisitions, which are mathematically converted to implied minority discounts for valuation applications.

How do you measure the discount for lack of marketability?

You measure the discount for lack of marketability by analyzing empirical studies of restricted stock transactions, pre-IPO sales, partnership interest transfers, and option pricing models that quantify the value reduction caused by illiquidity and inability to quickly sell ownership interests at known prices. Restricted stock studies compare prices paid for restricted (non-tradable) shares of public companies to the freely tradable shares of the same companies, with studies showing average discounts of 25 to 35 percent for restrictions lasting two years under pre-1997 SEC rules. Pre-IPO studies examine private transactions occurring shortly before companies go public, comparing private sale prices to subsequent public offering prices, with research showing average discounts of 40 to 50 percent reflecting the illiquidity of pre-IPO shares. The Longstaff put option model uses option pricing theory to value the put option that liquid securities possess but illiquid securities lack, calculating discounts based on volatility, holding period, and dividend yield assumptions. Company-specific factors affecting DLOM magnitude include size (larger companies have more potential buyers), profitability (profitable companies are more marketable), dividend history (distributions reduce liquidity needs), transfer restrictions (buy-sell agreements limit marketability), and expected holding period until liquidity events. Most appraisers apply DLOM ranging from 15 to 40 percent depending on these factors, with minority interests receiving larger discounts than controlling interests.

What is the difference between voting and non-voting stock premiums?

The difference between voting and non-voting stock premiums is that voting shares command premium values typically ranging from 2 to 10 percent above non-voting shares because they provide shareholders the power to elect directors, approve major transactions, and influence corporate governance decisions that non-voting shares cannot affect. This premium reflects the economic value of control rights including ability to participate in director elections, vote on mergers and acquisitions, approve amendments to corporate documents, and influence management decisions through shareholder activism. Research studies analyzing dual-class stock structures in public companies show voting shares trade at premiums averaging 3 to 6 percent over economically identical non-voting shares, with higher premiums occurring in situations where control contests are likely or where voting rights could swing control to different shareholder groups. The voting premium is larger for closely held companies where voting rights may determine who controls the business, compared to widely held public companies where individual votes have minimal impact on outcomes. Some situations show minimal voting premiums when controlling shareholders hold sufficient votes that minority voting rights have no practical impact on outcomes. The premium also depends on whether the non-voting shares have any protective rights like approval requirements for fundamental transactions, which can reduce the value differential. Voting premiums are applied in valuations when comparing values of different share classes or when converting between voting and non-voting ownership interests.

Are discounts and premiums allowed in ESOP valuations?

Discounts and premiums are allowed in ESOP valuations with important limitations; while minority discounts are generally not permitted when valuing controlling interests held by ESOPs, discounts for lack of marketability are typically applied to reflect the illiquid nature of private company shares, and control premiums may apply when the ESOP holds a controlling stake being valued for sale purposes. The Department of Labor takes the position that ESOP shares should generally be valued without minority discounts when the ESOP owns a controlling interest because the ESOP trustee has fiduciary duty to exercise control rights for participants' benefit, making the control value most appropriate. However, DLOM is generally accepted in ESOP valuations because ESOP shares lack ready markets and participants face restrictions on when and how they can sell shares back to the company. The DLOM for ESOP shares typically ranges from 10 to 25 percent depending on company size, profitability, and repurchase obligation sustainability. When valuing ESOP companies for sale transactions, control premiums may apply because the ESOP's controlling stake would command premium prices from strategic buyers. The specific treatment of discounts and premiums in ESOP valuations depends on the purpose of the valuation, whether the ESOP holds controlling or minority interests, and whether the valuation relates to ongoing plan administration or a potential sale transaction. ESOP appraisers must carefully document their discount and premium decisions to withstand DOL scrutiny.

What is company-specific risk premium?

Company-specific risk premium is an additional return component added to the discount rate in the build-up method to compensate investors for unique risks associated with the specific company being valued that are not captured by market risk, size risk, or systematic risk factors, typically ranging from 0 to 5 percent depending on company circumstances. This premium reflects unsystematic risks that could be diversified away in a portfolio but matter to investors considering a concentrated investment in a single private company. Factors justifying company-specific risk premiums include customer concentration (heavy reliance on few customers increases risk), key person dependence (business relies on specific individuals), supplier concentration (dependence on limited suppliers), geographic concentration (operations in limited markets), lack of product diversification, financial leverage exceeding industry norms, pending litigation, regulatory uncertainties, technological obsolescence risks, and competitive threats. The premium also reflects company-specific factors like management depth, quality of financial reporting, strength of internal controls, and operational risks not reflected in industry or size-based risk measures. Quantifying company-specific risk premium requires professional judgment because limited empirical data exists to support specific percentages. Appraisers typically assess multiple risk factors, assign risk ratings, and determine appropriate premiums through informed analysis rather than mechanical formulas. The company-specific risk premium increases the discount rate, which reduces present value calculations, reflecting that riskier companies deserve lower valuations than less risky companies with similar cash flows.

No questions found matching your search. Try different keywords.