Blog

Valuing unlisted assets inside a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) has become more important under Division 296, because the tax measure relies on current market values to attribute earnings to members with higher Total Superannuation Balances. For Australian business owners, this matters where an SMSF holds unlisted shares, interests in private companies, or units in private unit trusts. In those cases, a defensible valuation is not just a compliance exercise, it can directly affect the earnings calculation, the member’s reported balance, and the integrity of the fund’s financial reporting.

Why unlisted SMSF assets need robust valuation support

Listed securities have an observable market price. Unlisted assets do not. That includes private company shares, stapled structures where no public market exists, and related-party unit trust interests commonly used in business succession and investment structures. For an SMSF, the absence of a quoted price means the trustee must rely on a valuation that reflects market value as at the relevant date, not a convenient estimate, historic cost, or management’s expectation of future performance.

This is a core business valuation issue. The value of an unlisted asset is only reliable if it can be defended using recognised valuation methodologies, appropriate assumptions, and evidence that would stand up to scrutiny from accountants, auditors, and the ATO. In practice, that means a valuation engagement, or at least a well-supported limited scope valuation engagement or calculation engagement depending on the assignment, the data available, and the purpose of the report under APES 225 Valuation Services.

How Division 296 changes the importance of market value

Division 296, which commenced on 1 July 2026, applies an additional 15% tax on earnings attributable to an individual’s Total Superannuation Balance between $3 million and $10 million, and an additional 25% above $10 million. The thresholds are indexed. Importantly, the tax applies to realised earnings only under the final law, it is assessed personally to the individual rather than to the fund, and first assessments are issued in the 2027-28 year for the 2026-27 financial year.

From a valuation perspective, the key point is straightforward. SMSFs holding business assets, business real property, or interests in privately held companies or unit trusts must obtain current market valuations for Division 296 purposes. There is also an optional cost base reset to market value as at 30 June 2026, which makes a reliable market valuation at that date especially important. For owners whose retirement savings are tied to business structures, the valuation of those assets can materially influence the starting point for future calculations.

What “market value” means for private company shares and unit trusts

Market value is not what the trustee would like to receive, what the related party paid years ago, or what the underlying assets cost. It is the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction, after proper marketing, where both parties act knowledgeably and without compulsion.

That definition becomes more complex with private interests. The valuer must consider whether the asset is a minority or controlling interest, whether there are shareholder agreements or trust deeds that restrict transfer, whether distributions are discretionary, and whether the investment is effectively a passive holding or part of an operating business structure. These factors affect value materially because a buyer of an unlisted interest does not receive the same liquidity, governance rights, or exit certainty as a buyer of listed securities.

Private company shares

When an SMSF holds shares in a private company, the appropriate valuation method depends on the business model. An operating company may be valued using EBITDA multiples, maintainable earnings, DCF analysis, or a blend of methods supported by comparable transactions. A start-up or fast-growth business may require a stronger emphasis on revenue multiples, ARR multiples, customer retention, and unit economics if earnings are still volatile or reinvestment heavy.

At the other end of the spectrum, a mature business with steady cash flows may be best assessed using normalised earnings and a market approach cross-checked against a DCF model. Relevant adjustments often include owner salaries, personal expenses, non-recurring costs, related-party charges, and working capital normalisation. These are not accounting niceties. They directly affect the value of the shares held by the SMSF.

Unit trust interests

Private unit trusts present their own valuation issues. The underlying assets may be property, business interests, or a mix of investments. A trust can hold significant value on paper, but if cash flow is weak, gearing is high, distributions are discretionary, or the units cannot be readily sold, a discount for lack of marketability may be appropriate. If the holding is non-controlling, a discount for lack of control may also be relevant.

Where a trust is effectively a holding vehicle for business real property or an operating business, the valuer needs to trace the economics of the underlying asset, then assess how much of that value is actually attributable to the unit parcel being valued. That requires understanding the deed, related-party arrangements, and any transfer restrictions that affect the practical ability to realise value.

Valuation methodologies used by Australian valuers

For unlisted SMSF assets, there is no single method that fits every situation. A credible valuation engagement typically considers multiple approaches and then weights them based on the facts.

The income approach, particularly a discounted cash flow model, is often useful where future cash flows can be forecast with reasonable confidence. This is common for recurring-revenue businesses, private equity style investments, and corporatised operating companies with visible earnings paths. The discount rate must reflect risk, often through a WACC analysis, and the terminal growth rate needs to be supportable. Aggressive growth assumptions are a common source of valuation weakness. In many Australian businesses, a long-term terminal growth rate above inflation-plus-a-modest-premium is difficult to defend unless there is clear evidence of durable competitive advantage.

The market approach remains highly relevant. Earnings multiples, EBITDA multiples, SDE multiples, revenue multiples, and ARR multiples can all be persuasive if the comparable set is credible and adjustments are made for size, growth, concentration, margin profile, and governance. For example, a stable, profitable SME might trade in a broad EBITDA multiple range of around 3 times to 6 times, while stronger software and subscription businesses may command materially higher ARR-based multiples where net revenue retention is strong, churn is low, and gross margins are scalable. These are broad market observations only, not rules of thumb.

The asset approach can also matter, particularly where the underlying value is driven by tangible assets, investment property, or a partially realisable balance sheet. This is often relevant where the SMSF holds a company or trust whose principal value sits in business real property, plant and equipment, or marketable investments rather than ongoing earnings.

Australian valuation and tax considerations that intersect with SMSFs

Australian business owners often underestimate how many valuation issues are connected to the SMSF structure. Division 296 is one driver, but it sits alongside broader tax and compliance considerations. CGT treatment, the small business CGT concessions, the 15-year exemption, and the active asset rules can all affect the economics of a business interest held in or transferred to superannuation. In private companies, Division 7A issues may also affect value if shareholder loans or unpaid present entitlements distort the balance sheet or cash flows.

There is also an interaction with market value guidance from the ATO. Trustees cannot simply rely on book value or an internal estimate where the asset is unlisted and material. The valuation must be supportable, independent where appropriate, and consistent with the relevant purpose. For business real property held by an SMSF, that means looking through any related-party ownership structure and determining what unrelated parties would likely pay on the valuation date.

GST treatment on business sales as a going concern is another example of why valuation support must be commercially grounded. While GST does not determine market value, it can influence transaction pricing and the evidence a valuer uses when comparing transactions. Likewise, if a related-party sale is being considered, the transaction price may not reflect arm’s length value without adjustment.

Common mistakes trustees and advisers make

One of the most common mistakes is relying on historical cost or last year’s financial statements. A private business can change quickly, especially where customer concentration, debt levels, working capital needs, or market conditions have shifted. A second mistake is assuming that an asset has the same value to everyone. In valuation work, market value is not the same as strategic value, replacement cost, or book equity.

Another issue is ignoring the effect of minority interest, transfer restrictions, and marketability discounts. A 20% parcel in a private company is rarely worth 20% of the implied enterprise value on a simple arithmetic basis. If liquidity is thin and control absent, a discount may be justified. Conversely, a controlling parcel can warrant a premium if it gives practical control over dividends, strategy, and exit timing.

There is also a temptation to treat recurring revenue businesses as if they are all the same. They are not. Two businesses with similar ARR can have very different values depending on net revenue retention, customer tenure, gross margin, churn, implementation costs, and the quality of revenue. These are the exact factors a market participant would assess before paying an EBITDA or ARR multiple.

When a limited scope valuation or calculation engagement may be suitable

APES 225 recognises that not every assignment requires the same level of depth. A full valuation engagement is generally appropriate where the asset is material, the structure is complex, the value may be subject to scrutiny, or the purpose is important, such as a Division 296-related market valuation at a key date. A limited scope valuation engagement may be suitable where the available information is constrained but still sufficient for a reasoned conclusion. A calculation engagement may assist where the scope is tightly defined and the client understands that the result is based on agreed procedures and assumptions rather than a broader exercise of judgement.

For SMSF trustees, the practical question is whether the valuation will be robust enough for the purpose. If the asset is material to the member’s superannuation balance, or the structure involves related-party holdings, it is usually prudent to seek a formal valuation from a qualified valuer rather than rely on template calculations or management estimates.

Conclusion

Valuing unlisted SMSF assets for Division 296 is fundamentally a business valuation exercise. Whether the holding is private company shares, unlisted units, or an interest in a privately controlled structure, the value must reflect market reality as at the relevant date. That means using recognised methodologies, supporting assumptions with evidence, and understanding how control, marketability, cash flow quality, and tax considerations affect value.

For Australian business owners, this is not only about compliance. It is about making sure the true economic value of your business interests is properly recognised in superannuation, particularly where Division 296, the 30 June 2026 cost base reset, and related valuation requirements intersect. If you hold unlisted assets in an SMSF and need a defensible valuation engagement, contact InteleK Business Valuations & Advisory to arrange a confidential consultation.