Blog

Choosing an M&A adviser is not just a transaction decision, it is a valuation decision. For Australian business owners considering a sale, the quality of the adviser directly affects how the business is positioned, how value is measured, which buyers are approached, and ultimately what price and terms can be achieved. The right adviser should be able to support a robust valuation engagement, defend the logic behind the valuation, and connect that valuation to a credible market process.

Why the adviser’s valuation capability matters

In a privately held business sale, the headline multiple is only part of the story. Buyer interest is shaped by earnings quality, recurring revenue, customer concentration, working capital requirements, growth prospects, and the business’s exposure to key-person risk. A strong adviser understands how these factors flow through to enterprise value, equity value, and deal structure. A weak adviser may talk “price” without properly understanding how value is actually supported in the market.

For Australian owners, this distinction matters because the sale process often intersects with tax, structuring, and compliance considerations. Capital Gains Tax (CGT), the small business CGT concessions, the 15-year exemption, active asset rules, Division 7A on private company loans, and GST treatment on business sales as a going concern can all influence the net outcome. An adviser does not need to be your tax adviser, but they should understand where valuation issues intersect with these rules and know when specialist advice is required.

Start with sector track record

The first filter should be sector track record. Buyers value industries differently, and so do valuers. A business operating in professional services, software, contract manufacturing, medical, transport, franchising, or trade services will be assessed using different valuation lenses. The adviser should be able to explain how similar businesses have been priced, what metrics were used, and which value drivers mattered most.

Look for evidence of completed transactions or valuation engagements in businesses with comparable revenue size, earnings profile, customer concentration, and growth characteristics. A credible adviser should be familiar with the valuation implications of EBITDA margins, SDE normalisation for owner-managed businesses, and recurring revenue characteristics such as annual contract value, churn, and net revenue retention (NRR). In subscription-based businesses, for example, strong NRR and low churn can justify materially higher valuation multiples than a business with lumpy, transactional revenue.

Sector track record also helps the adviser distinguish between headline industry multiples and what is actually achievable for your business. In some sectors, healthy businesses may trade around 4 to 7 times maintainable EBITDA. In high-quality SaaS businesses, enterprise value may be expressed as a revenue multiple, often with wide dispersion depending on growth rate, margin profile, and retention. A B2B services firm with stable earnings may attract a different multiple again, particularly if revenue is concentrated or the business is highly dependent on the owner.

Ask how they normalise earnings

Track record is not just about knowing the sector. It is also about knowing how to normalise earnings. A serious adviser should be able to identify owner-related expenses, non-recurring costs, below-market related-party wages, excessive directors’ remuneration, and unusual one-off items. In privately held businesses, these adjustments can materially affect maintainable earnings and therefore valuation.

The adviser should also know when a calculation engagement is sufficient and when a full valuation engagement is more appropriate under APES 225 Valuation Services. If the matter involves shareholders, family transfers, related-party disputes, tax planning, or a sale process where the value conclusion may be scrutinised, a full valuation engagement is generally the safer and more defensible path.

Assess the buyer network, but test its quality

A broad buyer network sounds attractive, but quantity alone is not enough. What matters is whether the adviser has access to the right buyers for your business and whether those buyers are active, credible, and financially capable. For a sale to be effective, the adviser needs to understand strategic buyers, financial buyers, private equity, corporates, family offices, and trade acquirers in the Australian market, as well as offshore buyers where appropriate.

From a valuation perspective, buyer depth matters because it affects price tension. A broader and better-aligned buyer pool can reduce reliance on a single strategic acquirer and improve the probability of achieving fair market value or, in some circumstances, strategic value. If the adviser has access to buyers who regularly transact in your sector, they are more likely to understand what forms of growth, margin expansion, and synergy are worth paying for.

However, buyers also price in risk. If the business has small customer cohorts, weak reporting, uncertain forecast visibility, or unrecorded working capital issues, the buyer pool may narrow quickly. The adviser should be able to anticipate where diligence friction will arise and help you prepare the business accordingly, because those issues can materially affect value realisation.

Look for evidence of value discipline

A good adviser does not simply “shop the business” and chase the highest verbal indication. They test which buyers understand the valuation drivers and which are likely to complete on acceptable terms. In practice, the best buyer is not always the one offering the highest multiple on day one. It is the buyer most likely to close, on terms that reflect the real economics of the business, including earn-outs, vendor finance, rollover equity, and working capital adjustments.

This is where valuation capability and buyer network must operate together. If a buyer is paying a high multiple, the adviser should be able to explain whether that premium is supported by synergies, strategic fit, or genuine operational strengths. Otherwise, the offer may be too optimistic to survive diligence.

Insist on strong valuation methodology

Any adviser you engage should be comfortable discussing valuation methodology in plain English. For Australian private businesses, that usually means a blend of income-based and market-based approaches, with the appropriate method depending on the business profile.

For earnings-based businesses, discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is often relevant where future cash flows are reasonably forecastable. DCF requires careful assumptions around revenue growth, EBITDA margin, capital expenditure, working capital, and terminal value. The discount rate, often derived using a weighted average cost of capital (WACC), must reflect the business’s risk profile, capital structure, size, and market conditions.

For many smaller private businesses, especially those with stable earnings but less detailed forecasting, market multiples may play a central role. EBITDA multiples, SDE multiples, revenue multiples, and ARR multiples are commonly used comparisons, but they must be applied with judgment. A multiple without context is not a valuation. The adviser should explain why a comparable transaction is relevant, how it differs from your business, and what adjustments are needed for control, marketability, or growth quality.

Discounts for lack of marketability and, where relevant, discounts for lack of control can also arise in shareholder disputes, succession matters, tax-related valuations, and minority interests. An adviser who understands these concepts is far more likely to produce a defensible valuation conclusion than one who relies on generic industry chatter.

Check licensing, credentials, and standards compliance

In Australia, professional standing matters. Ask whether the adviser works under APES 225 Valuation Services and whether they can explain the difference between a valuation engagement, a limited scope valuation engagement, and a calculation engagement. These distinctions are important because they affect the scope of work, assumptions, reporting depth, and the level of reliance that can be placed on the conclusion.

A valuation engagement is the most comprehensive option and is generally the most suitable where the valuation may be scrutinised by buyers, lawyers, accountants, courts, regulators, or the ATO. A limited scope valuation engagement may be appropriate in narrower circumstances, but the limitations must be clearly understood. A calculation engagement is even more restricted and should not be treated as a substitute for a fully reasoned valuation where a robust conclusion is needed.

Also ask about relevant professional memberships, quality control procedures, conflict management, and independence. If the adviser has a commercial stake in the sale process, the valuation work should be carefully separated from advocacy. A valuer must be able to support the numbers even when they are inconvenient.

Australian tax and compliance considerations can affect value

Australian tax settings can materially affect both buyer demand and seller outcomes, which is why the adviser should understand the valuation implications. CGT concessions may enhance the after-tax outcome for eligible owners, and that can influence how much flexibility exists on price versus structure. The small business CGT concessions, including the 15-year exemption and active asset rules, can be especially important for long-held businesses and business real property.

Division 7A issues can also affect value where private company loans, unpaid present entitlements, or shareholder drawings are present. These matters may require balance sheet clean-up before sale, because buyers typically discount uncertainty and contingent risk. Likewise, GST treatment on the sale of a business as a going concern should be considered early, as it can affect working capital and closing mechanics.

Where relevant, business owners with SMSFs holding business assets, business real property, or shares in a privately held company should note the growing importance of current market valuations for Division 296 purposes. Division 296 commenced on 1 July 2026 and applies as a personal tax to the individual, not the fund. It taxes realised earnings only, with the $3 million and $10 million thresholds indexed, and first assessments are issued in the 2027-28 year for the 2026-27 financial year. The valuation relevance is direct, because current market values may also support an optional cost base reset to market value as at 30 June 2026. That is another reason owners may require a professional valuation from a qualified valuer.

Common mistakes when choosing an adviser

One of the most common mistakes is selecting an adviser who sounds commercially confident but cannot explain the valuation logic. Another is choosing someone purely on the size of their buyer list, without testing whether those buyers actually transact in the relevant sector. Owners also sometimes accept valuation language that is too loose, such as relying on generic “market price” commentary without evidence from comparable transactions, normalised earnings, or a disciplined valuation model.

It is also a mistake to assume a high proposed sale price is automatically credible. If the number is not supported by maintainable earnings, forecast cash flow, sector benchmarks, and buyer appetite, it may not survive diligence. In private business sales, overstatement can be more damaging than conservatism because it can stall a process, weaken buyer confidence, and reduce final value.

What a strong adviser should be able to show you

Before appointing an adviser, ask for examples of how they have approached valuation in businesses with similar features to yours. They should be able to discuss sector multiples, the logic behind DCF assumptions where relevant, how they treat normalisation adjustments, and how they assess working capital requirements. They should also be comfortable explaining why a full valuation engagement is or is not needed under APES 225, depending on the assignment.

Just as importantly, they should be able to communicate with accountants, lawyers, and buyers without losing the integrity of the valuation. That coordination is often what separates a clean transaction from a difficult one. A well-supported valuation gives business owners negotiating strength, helps frame realistic expectations, and reduces the risk of value being left on the table.

Conclusion

Choosing an M&A adviser should begin with a valuation question: can this person or firm credibly support the value of my business in an Australian market context? If the answer is yes, and they combine sector track record, a genuine buyer network, sound valuation methodology, and proper professional credentials, they are far better placed to help you achieve a defensible outcome.

If you are considering a sale, succession, restructure, or transaction planning exercise, InteleK Business Valuations & Advisory can assist with a confidential, professional valuation engagement tailored to your circumstances. Contact us to schedule a confidential consultation and discuss how a well-reasoned valuation can support your next decision.