Blog

Division 296 highlights a practical valuation issue that Australian business owners often overlook until a superannuation tax notice becomes real, how do you meet a tax liability when the underlying assets are illiquid, lumpy, or difficult to convert to cash? For self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) holding business real property, shares in private companies, or other private market interests, the answer depends heavily on current market valuations. A well-constructed valuation engagement does more than support compliance, it frames liquidity risk, informs tax planning, and helps owners and advisers assess whether the asset base can reasonably sustain future obligations.

Why liquidity matters in valuation, not just taxation

When a business owner hears about a tax on superannuation earnings, the immediate focus is often on the rate. The more important valuation question is whether the asset mix can support the tax without forcing a distressed sale. Illiquid assets, by definition, are not easily sold at short notice without affecting price. That includes operating businesses, business real property, minority holdings in private companies, and structured investments in private markets.

In valuation terms, illiquidity is not a side issue. It affects marketability, discount rates, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) assumptions, and ultimately the practical value that can be realised by an owner. A valuation prepared under APES 225 Valuation Services should consider not just the headline enterprise value, but the asset’s ability to generate cash, the timing of distributions, and the likely exit pathway. A business may be profitable on paper and still create a liquidity problem if tax liabilities arrive before the owner can convert value into cash.

What Division 296 means for owners of private business assets

Division 296 is the additional superannuation tax that commenced on 1 July 2026. It applies to earnings attributable to a member’s Total Superannuation Balance above $3 million, with an additional 15% tax between $3 million and $10 million, and an additional 25% above $10 million. The thresholds are indexed. Importantly, under the final law it taxes realised earnings only, so unrealised gains are not taxed. It is also a personal tax assessed to the individual, not to the fund. First assessments are issued in the 2027-28 year for the 2026-27 financial year.

For valuation purposes, the most relevant feature is that SMSFs holding business assets, business real property, or interests in privately held companies must use current market valuations for Division 296 purposes. That includes the optional cost base reset to market value as at 30 June 2026. In practice, this creates a direct need for a professional valuation where the fund holds lumpy assets that are not quoted on a public market.

This is where the valuation problem becomes real. A business owner may have substantial net worth inside superannuation, but if the underlying assets are not readily saleable, the tax liability can be difficult to fund without rebalancing the portfolio or crystallising value through a sale or borrowing strategy. The valuation engagement therefore becomes a practical planning tool, not just a compliance exercise.

How a valuer frames the liquidity problem

A professional valuer will typically distinguish between economic value, marketability, and cash realisation. A private business might hold a strong earnings base, yet the owner may still face a liquidity discount if the likely buyer pool is narrow or if the asset cannot be sold quickly at full value. This distinction matters in SMSFs because a tax obligation is cash based, even where the underlying asset base is not.

For example, a control interest in a mature private operating business may be valued using an EBITDA multiple approach, supported by comparable transactions and industry benchmarks. Depending on sector, quality of earnings, and growth, market multiples commonly vary from around 3 times to 8 times EBITDA, although strong recurring revenue businesses can trade well above that range. A lower growth industrial business might sit closer to the lower end, while founder-led software or specialist services businesses with strong retention and scalable margins may command materially higher multiples. None of that changes the liquidity question. A notional valuation of the equity does not guarantee a same-day sale at that value.

Where recurring revenue is central to value, a valuer will often look at revenue multiples, annual recurring revenue, churn, and net revenue retention (NRR). As a broad rule, businesses with NRR above 110% and low churn tend to attract stronger multiples than those with declining cohorts or volatile revenue. But even a high-quality recurring revenue business can be illiquid if ownership is tightly held or if a transaction requires extensive due diligence, financing, or regulatory approvals.

Valuation methodology, cash flow, and normalisation

The valuation methodology must reflect the asset’s cash-generating reality. For a privately held business, the discounted cash flow (DCF) method is often useful where cash flows can be forecast with reasonable confidence. The valuer estimates future free cash flows, applies a discount rate such as WACC, and arrives at present value. That approach helps separate accounting profit from distributable value. It also highlights whether the business is actually generating excess cash that could support tax payments or shareholder distributions.

Where a DCF is not the best primary method, market-based approaches remain essential. Comparable company multiples and precedent transactions provide evidence of what informed buyers are paying in the market. However, each multiple must be adjusted for size, customer concentration, margin quality, reliance on key people, and working capital needs. A business with strong EBITDA but heavy reinvestment requirements may have less cash available for tax than a similar business with lower capital intensity.

Normalisation adjustments are equally important. Owner salaries, discretionary expenses, related-party charges, unusually high working capital levels, and one-off gains or losses can distort the underlying economic picture. In a Division 296 context, the precision of the valuation matters because the tax is linked to the member’s superannuation earnings position. If the asset is a private company shareholding, the valuation must reflect the market value of that interest, not simply the balance sheet number or the owner’s estimate.

For minority holdings, a valuer may also consider discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability. A minority stake in a private company frequently commands a lower per-share value than a control interest because the holder cannot direct dividends, strategy, or sale timing. That discount is not a tax planning tool by itself, but it is central to a credible valuation engagement under APES 225.

Australian market context and tax interactions

Australian business owners often hold private assets across superannuation, trusts, and operating entities, so the interaction between tax and valuation is rarely isolated. A business real property asset inside an SMSF may be highly valuable from a balance sheet perspective, yet produce no income unless leased. A private company shareholding may generate retained profits, but access to cash can also be affected by Division 7A on private company loans, franking considerations, and shareholder loan structures. When a business sale is contemplated, GST treatment on the sale as a going concern and the availability of the small business CGT concessions may materially affect net proceeds and therefore how liquidity is managed.

In a sale scenario, the valuation should not ignore these Australian tax settings. The 15-year exemption and active asset rules can change the after-tax outcome materially, which in turn affects what an owner can actually use to meet obligations. A business might be worth a certain amount on a pre-tax basis, but if tax costs or sale frictions consume much of the proceeds, the effective liquidity available to fund a superannuation tax bill is much lower. That is why advisers should read valuation outputs alongside tax and legal advice, not in isolation.

Common mistakes owners make when they rely on an estimate

One common mistake is treating market value as immediate cash value. Those are not the same thing. Another is assuming that because an asset is profitable, it can easily be sold or partially sold to meet a tax bill. In private markets, that is often not the case. Buyers require due diligence, financing, warranties, and time. Even where demand is strong, transaction timing may not align with tax timing.

A second mistake is relying on a balance sheet or a simple multiple without considering the asset’s specific risks. Two businesses with the same EBITDA can have very different values if one has recurring revenue, diversified customers, low owner dependency, and strong conversion to cash, while the other depends on a narrow client base and the founder’s personal relationships. For Division 296 purposes, that difference can materially affect the valuation and the liquidity assessment.

A third mistake is using outdated numbers. Private business values move with profit trends, capital markets, interest rates, and transaction evidence. In periods where WACC is rising, buyers typically become more selective, particularly in smaller lower middle market businesses. That can reduce achievable multiples and lengthen sale timelines. A current valuation is therefore essential, especially where the fund holds assets that may need to be measured at market value for tax reporting.

Why a professional valuation is the right starting point

For business owners, the practical lesson is straightforward. If your SMSF holds lumpy or illiquid assets, a professional valuation helps quantify both value and liquidity risk. It provides a supportable market value for compliance purposes, but it also helps advisers assess whether future tax obligations can be met without forced sales or unnecessary value leakage. That is particularly important where the asset is a private company interest or business real property, because those assets cannot be assumed to behave like cash or listed securities.

A properly scoped valuation engagement, whether a full valuation engagement, a limited scope valuation engagement, or a calculation engagement, should be matched to the purpose, the asset type, and the level of reliance required. Under APES 225, the scope should be clear, the assumptions transparent, and the methodology fit for purpose. In a Division 296 context, that clarity matters because the valuation may have both tax and strategic consequences.

If you hold private business assets inside superannuation and want to understand the valuation implications of Division 296, InteleK Business Valuations & Advisory can assist with a confidential, independent assessment tailored to your circumstances. A considered valuation now can help you plan for liquidity, strengthen compliance, and make better decisions before tax deadlines or transaction pressures reduce your options.