Blog

Division 296 is set to change how many self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustees think about asset allocation, particularly where an SMSF holds business assets, business real property, or shares in a privately held company. For business owners, the valuation issue is not peripheral. It is central. As member balances near or exceed the relevant thresholds, current market valuation becomes essential for tax reporting, strategy review, and any decision about whether to retain, reweight, or realise business-related assets inside superannuation.

Why Division 296 matters for SMSF investment strategy

Division 296 is a personal tax, assessed to the individual member rather than to the fund. It applies from 1 July 2026, with first assessments issued in the 2027-28 year for the 2026-27 financial year. The legislation taxes realised earnings only, not unrealised gains, and the thresholds of $3 million and $10 million are indexed. For members whose total superannuation balance falls between those thresholds, the additional tax is 15 per cent on attributed earnings. Above $10 million, the additional tax is 25 per cent.

From a valuation perspective, the key implication is simple: the market value of SMSF assets now has greater strategic significance. If an SMSF holds a private business interest, business real property, or other unlisted assets, the trustee cannot rely on broad estimates or stale figures when reviewing the fund’s position. A current valuation may influence contribution planning, pension commencement decisions, liquidity management, and the timing of asset sales or rebalancing.

How business assets in an SMSF can alter the allocation decision

Many SMSFs hold a concentrated portfolio because business owners often use superannuation to acquire property linked to their trading operations, or take minority or majority interests in private companies. Those assets can perform well, but they also introduce valuation complexity and concentration risk. Under Division 296, that complexity becomes more visible because accurate current market values flow directly into the member’s total superannuation balance.

For example, an SMSF holding business real property may have benefited from capital growth over time. If that growth materially lifts the member’s balance over $3 million, the trustee may need to consider whether the asset concentration is still consistent with the overall retirement strategy. Similarly, if an SMSF holds private company shares, the value may depend on maintainable earnings, sector multiples, customer concentration, management depth, and future growth expectations. A change in market conditions can alter the valuation enough to affect the overall Division 296 position.

That is why the discussion is not just about tax incidence. It is about portfolio design. A valuation can identify whether an asset is acting as a stable income-producing holding, or whether it is carrying embedded growth that could push the member into a higher tax exposure band.

The valuation lens, what a valuer will examine

A professional valuation engagement under APES 225 considers the asset’s current market value as at a specific date, using appropriate methodology and supporting evidence. For privately held businesses and business real property, that usually means a combination of income, market, and asset-based reasoning, depending on the nature of the asset and the quality of information available.

Business interests and private company shares

Where an SMSF holds shares in a private company, a valuer will typically look at maintainable earnings, historical and normalised financial results, growth rates, and the appropriate valuation multiple. EBITDA multiples are commonly used for trading businesses, while SDE multiples are more relevant for owner-managed businesses where discretionary expenses and owner remuneration need to be normalised. If the business has recurring revenue, revenue or ARR multiples may also be relevant, particularly where churn, net revenue retention, and contract duration support predictable future earnings.

For higher-quality businesses, the market may justify stronger multiples. A business with stable recurring revenue, low churn, and strong NRR can command a materially higher value than a comparable business with one-off sales and volatile margins. By contrast, a low-margin business with customer concentration, weak forecast visibility, or dependency on a single founder is generally valued more conservatively. Discounted cash flow analysis may also be appropriate where future cash flows can be forecast with reasonable confidence. In that case, the valuer will assess WACC, terminal value assumptions, capex, working capital movements, and scenario risk.

Business real property

Where the SMSF holds business real property, the valuation issue often turns on leasing terms, market rent, zoning, alternate use, and the property’s relationship to the operating business. The asset may be supporting the business’s trading operations, but it still requires a market value assessment. For Division 296 purposes, there is no room for casual book values or outdated internal estimates. A current valuation helps the trustee support the balance reported to the ATO and informs whether the asset remains appropriate within the broader investment strategy.

Why current market value matters at 30 June 2026 and beyond

One of the most important practical issues is the optional cost base reset to market value as at 30 June 2026. For SMSFs holding unlisted assets, that date can become a reference point for future tax and reporting consequences. If a trustee elects to reset cost base positions, the valuation used must be supportable and contemporaneous. That means the quality of the valuation affects not just the current balance, but also the integrity of future calculations and records.

This is where a valuation engagement is often more appropriate than a shortcut approach. A full valuation engagement is typically the right option when the asset is material, the ownership structure is complex, or the figures may be scrutinised by auditors, accountants, or the ATO. A Limited Scope Valuation Engagement may suit less complex assignments where the information base is narrower, but it still needs to be fit for purpose. A Calculation Engagement can be useful where the client requires an estimate based on agreed assumptions, though it is generally not the preferred solution where material superannuation reporting consequences are involved.

Under APES 225, the distinction matters. The scope of work should match the purpose of the valuation and the level of reliance expected. For Division 296-related SMSF issues, a defensible current market valuation is usually more valuable than a low-cost estimate that cannot withstand review.

How Division 296 may change the way owners think about holding private business assets in super

Division 296 may encourage a more deliberate conversation about asset allocation. Some business owners may prefer to retain illiquid private assets inside the SMSF because the long-term economics are compelling. Others may decide that a high-growth private investment, once desirable from a retirement planning perspective, now needs to be balanced against the tax cost of a higher member balance.

That does not mean business assets should be sold reflexively. It means the valuation should be reviewed alongside the broader investment strategy. If a company interest is undervalued, the fund may be carrying more exposure than expected, and the Division 296 outcome could be different from what the trustee assumed. If the business has strong profit growth, an updated valuation may reveal that the asset is now a more significant contributor to the member’s superannuation balance than originally forecast.

For business owners, this can influence whether future growth should remain inside superannuation, whether the fund should diversify, or whether the operating business and the SMSF should be more clearly separated in strategy terms. The correct answer will vary, but it should always be based on current evidence rather than assumption.

Australian valuation issues that can influence the result

Australian valuation practice also interacts with other tax and structuring considerations. If a private company has loans, Division 7A issues may affect maintainable cash flow and therefore business value. If a business sale is contemplated, CGT timing, the small business CGT concessions, the 15-year exemption, and the active asset rules may affect the value realised by the owner. GST treatment on a business sale as a going concern can also affect transaction structure and net proceeds. In each case, the valuation must reflect the economic reality, not just the accounting presentation.

The ATO’s market value guidance is also relevant. Trustees should expect current market value to be supportable, well documented, and consistent with the asset’s actual characteristics. A figure based on old financials, a static bank valuation, or a generic rule of thumb may not be sufficient where the balance is material or the asset is unique. The stronger the documentation, the easier it is for advisers to rely on the result.

Common mistakes business owners and trustees should avoid

One of the most common errors is treating all unlisted assets as if they can be updated mechanically. Private business valuations are not formulaic in the way listed securities are. A minor change in earnings quality, customer concentration, or growth assumptions can have a meaningful effect on value, especially where EBITDA or SDE multiples are being applied.

Another mistake is relying on book value when market value is required. Financial statements may be useful starting points, but they rarely reflect the real earning capacity or marketability of a private business interest. Similarly, ignoring discounts for lack of marketability or control can distort the result where the SMSF holds a minority interest or where the asset cannot be readily sold.

A further issue is failing to revisit the valuation when circumstances change. Strong trading performance, renewed leasing, changes in interest rates, or a shift in sector sentiment can all affect value. For SMSFs exposed to private assets, a stale valuation can quickly undermine both tax reporting and strategic decision-making.

A practical approach for owners and advisers

The best way to manage the impact of Division 296 is to integrate valuation into the annual review process. Business owners and trustees should identify which SMSF assets are most sensitive to current market value, nominate the assets that need a full valuation engagement, and decide whether a Limited Scope Valuation Engagement or Calculation Engagement is sufficient for less material holdings.

Advisers should also test whether the fund’s investment strategy still suits the balance between liquidity, return, concentration, and tax exposure. A valuation does not determine the strategy by itself, but it provides the evidence needed to make informed decisions. That is particularly important where the SMSF’s largest asset is a private business interest or business property, because those assets can materially affect both the superannuation balance and the member’s broader wealth position.

Conclusion

Division 296 is more than a technical superannuation measure. For SMSF trustees who hold business assets, it is a prompt to reassess valuation evidence, portfolio concentration, and the strategic role of unlisted investments. Current market valuation is now an essential part of that process. It supports compliance, strengthens decision-making, and helps ensure that the fund’s structure remains aligned with the owner’s retirement objectives.

If your SMSF holds private business assets, business real property, or shares in a privately held company, and you want a valuation that is credible, well-supported, and fit for purpose, InteleK Business Valuations & Advisory can assist with a confidential valuation consultation tailored to your circumstances.